Comodo takes the lead (2008/05/17 11:05)We have tested the latest versions of ComodoFirewall Pro and Online Armor Personal Firewall Free. These productshad a perfect score after the last testing. We have implemented severalnew tests to differentiate between them. CFP passed almost all the newtests while OA had problems with keyloggers. Oddly, the new version ofCFP did not pass some of the tests that its older version passed, but CFP's results are still excellent and enough for the first place in our challenge.
We have also tested some new products. Theseare, sorted by their final score: Lavasoft Personal Firewall, WebrootDesktop Firewall, Trend Micro Internet Security 2008, F-Secure InternetSecurity 2008 and Panda Internet Security 2008. Visit Firewall Challenge for the complete results.
第一位：COMODO
第二位：ProSecurity
第三位：Outpost
可以看到 由于测试难度的增加 对于防御的要求也越来越高
那些附带了防火墙的HIPS和使用了主动防御模块的防火墙在测试中得分很高
最新回复
sbdn1124 (2008-5-19 10:22:39)
但是,怎样去把每个防火墙用的很好.还是个很大的难题.
想学习学习.~
不知道楼者是否能提供防火墙方面的教程.供偶们这些新手学习.
vendor (2008-5-19 10:50:55)
Prosecurity主要的功能在hips上，这个设置比较负责，我到时候找一些规则，注册码不好找
outpost好倒是好，但是注册码很难找，封的厉害
online armor也是带有hips的防火墙，似乎没有汉化的，这个也很好
我找了一些教程，后面再陆续发吧，有look'n'stop 的
当然推荐用comodo和online armor free edition，
gaochuang21 (2008-5-19 12:22:23)
yinxiaozhun (2008-5-20 06:45:25)